Rio scale
The Rio scale was proposed in 2000 as a means of quantifying the significance of a SETI detection.[1][2] The scale was designed by Iván Almár and Jill Tarter to help tell policy-makers how likely, from 0 to 10, it is that an extraterrestrial radio signal has been produced by an intelligent civilization.[3]
The scale is inspired by the Torino scale, which is used to determine the impact risk associated with near-Earth objects. Just as the Torino scale takes into account how significant an object's impact on the planet would be, the Rio scale takes into account how much a public announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence would probably impact society.
The IAA SETI Permanent Study Group officially adopted the Rio scale as a way of bringing perspective to claims of extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) detection, and as an acknowledgement that even false ETI detections may have disastrous consequences.[4][5]
The scale was modified in 2011 to include a consideration of whether contact was achieved through an interstellar message or a physical extraterrestrial artifact, including all indications of intelligent extraterrestrial life such as technosignatures.[6] A 2.0 version of the scale was proposed in 2018.[3][7][8]
Calculation[9]
In its 2.0 version, the Rio Scale, R, of a given event is calculated as the product of two terms.
The first term, Q, is the significance of the consequences of an event. It is determined considering three factors: the estimated distance to the source of the signal (a value between 0 and 4), the prospects for communicating with the source (a value between 0 and 4) and how likely is that the sender is aware of humanity (a value between -1 and 2). The value of each factor is determined by answering a question and Q is calculated by summing the three values.
The second term, δ, is the probability that the event actually occurred. Its value is determined by first calculating a term, J, based on three factors: the probability that the signal is real, the probability that it is not instrumental, and the probability that it is not natural or human-made. The values for these factors are determined by answering a questionnaire and J is calculated by summing them. δ is then calculated using the formula δ = 10(10-J)/2.
The final R value, going from 0 to 10, is the likelihood that the observed event was produced by an intelligent civilization.
Rating scale
Rio value | Importance |
---|---|
10 | Extraordinary |
9 | Outstanding |
8 | Far-reaching |
7 | High |
6 | Noteworthy |
5 | Intermediate |
4 | Moderate |
3 | Minor |
2 | Low |
1 | Insignificant |
0 | Nil |
See also
- Quiet and loud aliens
- San Marino Scale
References
- ^ "The Rio Scale" (PDF).
- ^ Arbesman, Samuel. "Quantifying Alien Encounters: The Rio Scale". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
- ^ a b Bartels,SPACE.com, Meghan. "To Fight Fake News, SETI Researchers Update Alien-Detection Scale". Scientific American. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
- ^ "How can you tell if that ET story is real? St Andrews scientists revise the Rio Scale for alien encounters".
- ^ Hall, Shannon. "Strange signals from 234 stars could be ET - or human error". New Scientist. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
- ^ Mike Wall (2016-10-28). "Mysterious Star Pulses May Be Alien Signals, Study Claims". Space.com. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
- ^ Tudhope, Christine. "Scientists revise the Rio Scale for reported alien encounters". phys.org. Retrieved 18 September 2022.
- ^ Bartels, Meghan (31 July 2018). "SETI Researchers Want to End the Alien-Detection Hype". Space.com. Retrieved 18 September 2022.
- ^ Forgan, Duncan; Wright, Jason; Tarter, Jill; Korpela, Eric; Siemion, Andrew; Almár, Iván; Piotelat, Elisabeth (August 2019). "Rio 2.0: revising the Rio scale for SETI detections". International Journal of Astrobiology. 18 (4): 336–344. Bibcode:2019IJAsB..18..336F. doi:10.1017/S1473550418000162. hdl:10023/16927. ISSN 1473-5504.
- v
- t
- e
- Shergotty meteorite (1865)
- Nakhla meteorite (1911)
- Murchison meteorite (1969)
- Viking lander biological experiments (1976)
- Allan Hills 77005 (1977)
- Allan Hills 84001 (1984)
- Yamato 000593 (2000)
- CI1 fossils (2011)
Misidentified |
|
---|---|
Stars |
|
Other |
|
habitability
- Catalog of Nearby Habitable Systems
- Circumstellar habitable zone
- Earth analog
- Extraterrestrial liquid water
- Galactic habitable zone
- Habitability of binary star systems
- Habitability of natural satellites
- Habitability of neutron star systems
- Habitability of red dwarf systems
- Habitability of K-type main-sequence star systems
- Habitability of yellow dwarf systems
- Habitability of F-type main-sequence star systems
- List of potentially habitable exoplanets
- Planetary habitability
- Superhabitable planet
- Tholin
- Beagle 2
- Biological Oxidant and Life Detection
- BioSentinel
- Curiosity rover
- Darwin
- Dragonfly
- Enceladus Explorer
- Enceladus Life Finder
- Europa Clipper
- ExoMars
- Rosalind Franklin rover
- ExoLance
- EXPOSE
- Foton-M3
- Icebreaker Life
- Journey to Enceladus and Titan
- Laplace-P
- Life Investigation For Enceladus
- Living Interplanetary Flight Experiment
- Mars Geyser Hopper
- Mars sample-return mission
- Mars 2020
- Northern Light
- Opportunity rover
- Perseverance rover
- SpaceX Red Dragon
- Spirit rover
- Tanpopo
- Titan Mare Explorer
- Venus In Situ Explorer
- Viking 1
- Viking 2
communication
- Active SETI
- Allen Telescope Array
- Arecibo message
- Arecibo Observatory
- Berkeley SETI Research Center
- Bracewell probe
- Breakthrough Initiatives
- Communication with extraterrestrial intelligence
- Gauss's Pythagorean right triangle proposal
- Astrolinguistics
- Lincos language
- NIROSETI
- Pioneer plaque
- Project Cyclops
- Project Ozma
- Project Phoenix
- SERENDIP
- Search for extraterrestrial intelligence
- SETI@home
- setiQuest
- Voyager Golden Record
- Water hole
- Xenolinguistics
extraterrestrial beings
- Ancient astronauts
- Astrobiology
- Astroecology
- Biosignature
- Brookings Report
- Exotheology
- Extraterrestrials in fiction
- Extremophile
- Hemolithin
- History of the extraterrestrial life debate
- MERMOZ
- Nexus for Exoplanet System Science
- Noogenesis
- Planetary protection
- Potential cultural impact of extraterrestrial contact
- Post-detection policy
- San Marino Scale
- Technosignature
- UFO religion
- Xenoarchaeology
This astrobiology-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e